The way investors view OBJ can nearly be defined in what their expectations were of the relationship with P&G.
Many (including me initially) saw it as "company making".
I'm not sure, though, that's how our Board / Management viewed it. If it was, it's difficult to imagine they would have accepted 2-3%.
I now believe that it was meant to provide the foundation on which a solid future could be planned and implemented.
It gives OBJ the following:
- solid (if unspectacular (but maybe not)) revenue for the next 3 - 5 years (probably cash-flow positive)
- a glowing endorsement from one of the most powerful players in their area of expertise in the world
- evidence / proof that the technology works
- the ability to identify and take to market themselves what could be even better opportunities
- time and space to make the next decisions in the very best interests of the company
Even though my position in OBJ has resulted in a 50% loss, I'm more comfortable than at any other time that this highly speculative investment will pay off significantly.
I'm looking forward to tomorrow.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- The big question is
The big question is, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
AHK
ARK MINES LIMITED
Ben Emery, Executive Director
Ben Emery
Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online