Very true. Not sure what I was thinking. I thought there was something i.e. under 5% that considered it not a 'substantial holding'?
I might be just confusing that with 'ceasing to be a substantial holder' and once that is the case no disclosure is required?
Again, feel free to correct me
100 bagger ?, page-321
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 401 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)