Hi cmk, I should have added this to my post yesterday but neglected to, I’ll say it and leave it at that.
One question I have asked MORE than once concerns the royalties in referance to sales of the kit with the wand in the longer term and IF any possible impact etc etc.
I am here to learn, I won’t learn or perhaps anybody else learn, if posters neglect to engage in meaningful dialogue on particular issues. I realise that without figures it would be hard to quantify accurate figures but I am still seeing NO attempt by anybody to even try or explain how my concern mightn’t be relevant.
LH, I was interested in a response from you, guess I AM repeating myself again ...lol, that’s fine, I would think at least I HAVE made a attempt to gain some clarity on my concerns and learn something new.
I think that there can be said to be a general consensus, perhaps largely unspoken off, that the previous BOD was ‘ineffective’, if that has basis to be correct, (I do think many posters may still not realise the enormity of the task the BOD had) then any ‘negativity’ by posters back then perhaps did have credence and was 100% justified.
Because we have a ‘new guard’ should not mean that we must remain entirely ‘postive’ blindly and not try to clarify any possible ‘negatives’.
Yes, we must ‘trust’ mangerment, though that trust will absolutely have to be justified in the future, not being ‘mindful’ of possible problems will again put us in a position where WE will not like to be in.
On a side note I am suprised, in hindsight, imo, that a group in the top twenty of Obj did not initiate action or done it sooner IF the ‘old guard’ was indeed that ‘ineffective’.
Cheers.
Expand
(20min delay)