Perhaps you're right but doesn't Niti Aayog have the authority to demand changes to the entire composition of the agreement? As an example, they are the ones that required a third party auditor claw through our entire financial history like a forensic detective which cost us months of delays.
So making the assumption that Niti Aayog will simply rubber-stamp the project is a little naive in my opinion. They can change, make suggestions and impose further delays all of which we are at their mercy.
If management know more- then they have to disclose this to shareholders.
Next Update, page-47
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(16.7%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.929M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $1.677K | 824.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | 18656688 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 8157020 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.43pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |