Stefans, I have a very simple understanding of this forum: it is for individuals to anonymously express their opinions regarding companies they are interested in or have a stake in. In my opinion the AGO issue is binary - have the AGO directors acted in the best interest of shareholders to maximise the value of investments, or have they neglected this duty?
I have held AGO share for a long time and have appreciated the contributions from many well informed individuals - to demean AGO holders by saying they are hoping for a miracle is not correct. They are hoping that the value of assets invested in will eventually be realised, taking into account global factors.
AGO holders are not defined as, to use your words, ignorant, dangerous and selfish. I am astonished how you can put this down in posting.
I would dearly love our directors to explain their position and tell us all that they are doing their best to protect our investment. In my opinion this would be a better use of their time than employing a PR company using our money to gauge the opinion of holders.
Let's leave it at that - hope you have a good weekend and enjoy the things that really matter in life.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGO
- Ann: Financial Update
Ann: Financial Update, page-94
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 140 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online