Sorry, this isn't correct. What has happened is that due to the revaluation of the underlying assets, too much performance fees have been accrued so they now need to be reduced. What this means in practice is that assuming the assets are sold at today's valuation, BLA would receive $7m less in cash than it was expecting to under the previous valuation.
Granted, BLA does not have to pay out $7m in cash today, but it does mean that in the longer term they are expecting to receive $7m less in performance fees than they had originally anticipated.
Of course, if the value of the underlying assets subsequently increase, further performance fees can be (re)accrued but it isn't right to say that this is equivalent to a non-cash writeoff like a diminution of goodwill.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BLA
- Ann: Update on Independent Review of Asset Valuations
Ann: Update on Independent Review of Asset Valuations, page-27
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BLA (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online