Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Facts Don't Lie:, page-193

First 193 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
mjp2

11,076 Posts.

315

29/05/18

20:47

Post #: 33360333
Share

Originally posted by jopo ↑

The biggest problem i have is being told what historical proxy data is deemed acceptable and which is not.

There is a plethora of papers which are clear in that sea levels have been higher.
I think anyone who dispute observational or historical evidence proxies but accepts "other" proxy data is the "denier"

We actually do know that sea levels have been higher at many locations around the globe.

We only have to look at Greenland.

We have been asked for DECADES to accept Greenland as some form of proxy of global temperatures (aka sea rise). And many here have pushed that line.

But then they also pass off greenland data as being isolated anytime you use the same data source to show that warming rates have been far higher than present.

Take a pill chill guys. We know sweet @&*# @* about our planet

Someone posted something on sea level "rise rates"
What a crock statement is that. Please post up the proxy data that come from that shows the actual sea levels. I will then post up the proxy data that makes that chart posted earlier by someone look like a teeny weeny little piss stream.

Expand

"The biggest problem i have is being told what historical proxy data is deemed acceptable and which is not."

Nope, jopo.

That's not your biggest problem.
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: Tariff fatigue truly evident; RBA eftpos proposal sinks Tyro

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

WIN

'Incorrect datasets': Old irony sets WIN Metals up for golden opportunity at Emjay

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Sayona intercepts, Bowen Coking crisis | July 15

First 193 Last

SPONSORED BY