Beginning to wonder on the veracity of much of the EM both airborne and to some extent ground/downhole in this area. Yes Degrussa was evident but it was bigger, and these smaller lenses may not be so evident plus the fact of depth below surface. Downhole is limited in search area. The old maxim of 400m vertical to the top of an orebody is the limit of economics in many cases unless the orebody is exceptional grade, good size etc. Added advantage capital spent already for a mill so depths may be extended to be able to extract smaller bodies beyond 400m vertical.
So it is blanket drilling along the ever changing stratigraphic interpretation as more data comes in - seems no short cut here to find more in what is also clearly very complex and might i suggest heavily faulted ground.
ENT Price at posting:
2.3¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)