The way I see it is 51% and 49% is how they split the value of the two companies, it has nothing to do with who is going to control it. Someone correct me if I am wrong please.[/QUOTE]
51% Vs 49% is a huge deal. If it wasn't why wouldn't 50/50 work... Control, Or lack of it.
There's no way 51/49 was a coincindence around values. It's a total strategy that I imagine would have been the deal breaker for the party wanting 51%.... As the 2% is everything in a voting situation!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TAW
- Ann: Merger Update
Ann: Merger Update, page-98
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)