I didn't mind the fact we gave away 51% of Matmor considering we still own 100% of HydoMOR, it is supposed to be more efficient than Matmor but I have noticed a change in the way the company talks about the techs:
Matmor is now talked about as using a Hydrogen based pathway, isn't that how HydoMOR was supposed to be better than Matmor?
In the latest presentation under Emerging Technology Solutions HydoMOR is Not mentioned.
Does it now mean that HydoMOR which we have patent applications for, proved to be not viable or did they realize that Matmor and HydoMOR are essentially the same thing?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.04M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | $519 | 173.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 26144876 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 31458521 | 40 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.59pm 08/08/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |