Just crystal ball gazing here: All IMO!!
IMO : Assuming Scandium to be just a by product (and so no costs allocated towards it), then we could be looking at a conservative figure of $260 Million pure contribution from sale of "by-product" Scandium in 5 years assuming Sca price as $750 per kilo.
Assuming the total CAPEX is say $750 Million, then that gives us only $490 Million CAPEX to be covered by Cobalt and Nickel!!! ($750mill minus $260Mill)
Now assuming that the expected payback period (Ignoring Scandium revenue) was say 5 years) to pay back $750Million as per PFS, ( then avg payback each year = 750 divided by 5 = $150 Million.
The balance of remaining CAPEX of $490 Million IMO could easily be repaid by Cobalt and Nickel production by......
.... 3.2 years!!! only!!! ($490mil divided by $150mill per year)
IMO the BFS could come out extremely Robust!!
Bring it on Baby!! (BB)
Possible BFS scenario
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 115 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AUZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
-0.001(6.25%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.48M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.7¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.7¢ | $7.069K | 988.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | 11334814 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8¢ | 981944 | 12 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.38pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AUZ (ASX) Chart |