Have MMX replied to the original query? Have they not neglected to satisfy the real issue here?
If you read the announcements it seems they are trying to confuse the market with smoke and mirrors. I am no expert, indeed a lay person at best, however even to a learner it seems there is more going on here.
What are MMX doing about all this? Is this a contrevention of the court order lodged earlier?
Is their defence changing to suit the situation?
Surfie, the bush lawyer, enlighten me.
In regards to the fundimentals, they mean diddly squat if MMX have been playing the market.
Dont take my advice I'm just an observer. Art imitating life.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MMX
- chm defence
chm defence, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MMX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online