Thanks for your response groundhog. Would also add if my response offended any long term holders it was unintended.
To clarify, I was not suggesting AGO go belly up tomorrow, but assuming the current market conditions prevail AGO would be left in a precarious position. We are already seeing predatory behaviour, not necessarily a bad thing either.
Assuming no clear outcomes materialise quickly, then the 30/6 reports will be telling. Reserves is likely to be zero if they pay down term loan b, cash is likely to drop due to expenses increasing (lithium, break fee, manganese??) or remain static, ore prices may impact negatively. New revenues are likely to be realised in 30/9 reports. Project this out over 12 months, balance sheet wise AGO is in serious trouble. I agree, AGO hasn’t explained its high expenses and what it is doing about it.
Your comments on obtaining funding is valid for future expansion, but it goes back to if Twiggy shares your vision for FMG. Gina, looking at the maps, seems to have the most synergies, the one likely to bring down AGO FOB costs.
Ports adds value for Twiggy to ship additional high grade ore let’s say an extra 10 to 20 mta over a 20 yr period assuming FOB costs does not blow out to do so. $50m to obtain a blocking stake may imply he is prepared to spend up to $500m for a takeover of ports (rights). His blocking stake suggests he only needs a seat at the table only and he believes ports would be shared. Gina’s 4.2 will flush out his true intentions.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGO
- Ann: Replacement Bidder's Statement
Ann: Replacement Bidder's Statement, page-114
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 182 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online