Share
3,781 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 331
clock Created with Sketch.
01/07/18
17:08
Share
Originally posted by Dragonlord
↑
I will admit I do not know much about the listing rules, but do they really have to announce all of that immediately? It's been mentioned a few times that they waited 23 days after the month end to announce the milestone... sounds like it's not too strict of a rule.
And I'm glad they have people like michael fricklas on the board and pwc there helping out so I can trust that this time they will be going by the book ...
I don't think it's obvious that there is no major rollout . And it's definately not obvious that there is. But I like to hear your opinions and hopefully investors take it all into account... I'm well aware I could lose my money but ive decided the opportunity cost if they turn out to be legit far outweighs the loss.
Anyway from the pizza hut deal to turn into a deal with the whole YUM brands means they like something avout it. Also the VP of sales hired who has a lot of comnections in the logistics and auto industry must be there for NA williams, and from my knowledge of consulting companies they are good at telling their clients what they should do... and most seem to listen.
And this isn't something spectacular but a company called Foodics which is another one of those POS companies based in the middle east posted on their twitter about being integrated with #getswift among a few others. So they are still growing the the smaller customer base but they haven't mentioned it to the market yet .... which is a good sign in my eyes that they are going to bundle all new info into one announcement.
I'm not going to write them off because I can't imagine a world where a big company needs something from a little company.
Expand
I believe it is within 5 days.
Originally posted by dim81
↑
1) I find it impossible for an MSA to exist and for nothing to come out of it. How much time and effort has gone into a global MSA, again, at the highest levels of both companies due to the nature of the service, and discretion requires from touching Amazon end users.
If nothing were to come out of it, then Amazon would have signed just to view the UI, functionality and smarts of the software with the purpose of copying it. We would have a lawsuit between the two companies and Amazon would not want to be the Goliath up against a David ( or really an ant) as this would damage their brand. Over half of Amazon's revenue is from partnering with minnow mum and dad businesses, they just would not do it.
2) Yes, but again, this is an advantage. The equivalent in Australia is a mixture of the FCAI and Deloitte consulting services which have a presence in the motoring industry. The advantage lies in NA being able to consult to multiple manufacturers head offices in one go, not having to approach, test and implement individually. This compresses the sales cycle and opens up the market.
Regards,
Dim81
Expand
MSA's do not involve "the highest levels of both companies". It would be a standard form at Amazon. They would have thousands of MSA's. They don't mean all that much. Having one is better than not, but it doesn't guarantee anything.