So your proposing AGO assets get reconfigured whatever that means (they only have Webber that's feasible).
AGO then invites the neighbours over to be reconfigured also (I am sure they will be receptive to that idea lol)
Then they go to FMG/HPPL cap in hand and suggest to them that AGO and their neighbours want to use your infrastructure because they can make more money? I would assume also FMG/HPPL would have to finance all the infrastructure also. (That will be an easy sell...not)
I would suggest you are not in mining and have never heard of the term "material risk" to your business model.
What absolute up ramping nonsense you propose.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGO
- Ann: Change in substantial holding
Ann: Change in substantial holding, page-81
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online