Share
clock Created with Sketch.
13/09/18
17:27
Share
Originally posted by pear
↑
Wotsup
What a waste of time you are. I give you verses from the bible. you decide that you do not like them and dismiss them and then re-post the same rubbish over and over again.
Do you really believe that repeating yourself make any difference. You are doing your usual garbage of deflecting until other posters get sick of you and just go away.
John 1.18 No one has seen God, but the one and only son who is HIMSELF GOD and is the closest relationship with the Father has made him known. Wherever this abomination, pack of lies comes from, you need to burn it!
I quoted straight out of the New International Version. Seeing your post I have done more research and it appears that there are different versions.
Now you are saying that this version is wrong. So tell us by what authority do you declare it wrong. I don't want rubbish like Greek translations etc etc. I want you to tell us on what authority you declare it wrong. Not your conclusion, but by what authority.
Stand back for one minute. Do you believe in the Immaculate Conception or not.
In your own words you said that Mary's eggs were not fertilised. So what was born but God? That is your first milk wotsup. Either the immaculate concepion is true, which makes Jesus God, or the immaculate conception is false and the whole of the Christian religion falls apart.
By the way, are you sure that no one has seen god?
Pear
Expand
Hi Pear,
Just as a matter of interest are you aware of this site ?
https://www.biblicalunitarian.com/verses/john-17-5
A brief look suggests they hold similar views to wotsup and may be a source for some of his ideas eg about Jesus being in the mind/plans of God well before his incarnation on Earth.
They appear to detail their Biblical objections to the Trinity doctrine fairly well, though Trinitarians might disagree.
As a bonus it is much easier to read and understand than the typical muddled bombardment of wotsupian "logic" !!