I'm wondering what happened to the Big Challenge to the Executive Remuneration.
There was some kind of a movement taking place in here. Then all the posts were pulled.
Those who claim to be concerned about this issue, should ask those who were involved, what happened?
Apparently it's OK to whinge in a chat room, but organising shareholder revolt seemed suddenly all too hard.
Why is that?
Why do some people think it's necessary to target my opinion, when the explanation about what happened to the revolt has never occurred.
I've commented on this issue a lot. For one thing, the inclusion of options as if they were cash.
If Tony Rovira and team hadn't made any finds, I think there would be grounds for being peeved.
But is that the situation?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZS
- Ann: 2018 Annual Report & Financial Statements
Ann: 2018 Annual Report & Financial Statements, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AZS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online