Extract from your post
quoted
The 2c options have a five year expiry suggesting it isnt reaching that price for some time if ever. Why would the note holders invest $200m by exercising these options to own only 29% of SDL (assume they would own 12b of 41.5b shares) when by nov 2019 SDL had no hope of paying the noteholders $132.9m so they would have ended up owning most of SDL.
unquoted
The reason is simple. If noteholders do not cancel the debts of 132 million in exchange of cash 50 million now and 2 million shares at 0.004 and 10 billion options at 0.020, nobody will be interested to finance the project. So noteholders have no choice except bearing the pain now for gaining better enterprise value in the future. Win win solution.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SDL
- Ann: ANS: Proposed $100m Placement & Strategic Investment in Sund
Ann: ANS: Proposed $100m Placement & Strategic Investment in Sund, page-222
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 121 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SDL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online