Shareholder Support, page-124

I would not be comfortable with a chair related to the vimson C/R. I doubt the Browns would be either.Re-reading yesterdays communication from Paul Brown,the following:"At this stage we don’t propose a replacement with a nominee of our choice"could indicate their willingness to provide a name or 2 in the future,if we remain chairless for too long. Interesting times for TNG now and it has felt to me for a while that a change is needed at TNG (for many reasons) including to add some energy and momentum.To this point we could hardly describe TNG as dynamic,this seems like a step in the right direction,assuming the vacancy is filled appropriately.
My hope is that this motion is not only successful,but by a decent margin,as this would send a clear message that the majority of TNG shareholders are unified in requiring accountability for the direction that THEIR company moves in.