Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting/Proxy Form, page-35

Mercury you can vote no but the realty if Patterson's have 7.1A and we are diluted to the maximum adds a fare bit of fire power to the yes provision for management. This is how they were approved last time and why Patterson's becomes an obvious choice where it should be also about share holder value...

Do you feel like you are not being represented properly as a share holder? I don't believe anyone was questioning the work ethic and certainly not the Resource. Some how in the past months since the mining licence was acquired in full from the March period the share price appreciation has been poor. The capping started around the time they announced the ultra high grade section along with the low ball reports. Did Cam Hardie write alone? This is when the reports were parachuted into our web site and not a word. What we hear is the 50% risk is fine but does this serve another purpose...Why 12% for one analyst then 50% for the next and no objection... We as posters have posted the fundamentals to detail and backed management right through. No we are not happy with 7.1A for obvious reason's and this is not a slur on management but never the less dot's will be drawn. Intent will be known...

The AGM on the 12th of November I believe.

Croc