@mcnamm
Firstly you have given us food for thought and as yet I have not cast any votes.
I thought this recent presentation was one of the best from CYP - pretty concise and a lot to look forward too .
The science is great
I’m wondering in regard to your lack of commercial deal comments if you had reflected on the possibility that any early ( pre data from GvHD and the required awaited report ) deals would have to have been done with a lot of unknowns and as such less favourable than ones CYP can possibly do soon with the available data .
We have been fortunate that cash available has meant that we have not needed to beg to the market for dollars.
Yep we all want things yesterday but I put it to you that we have been pretty well managed. The science is being proved up and a lot more valuable now than before .
Patience perhaps required grasshopper ( and other comrades )
(20min delay)