In a 'normal' world (which it ain't at present) and assuming they can readily extend the resource base (and hence mine life) one could easily argue a case for a much higher price....multiples of the current price.....that's all I'll say.
The short mine life is an issue from a valuation perspective, no question but on the flip side the QOL team looks like bringing Australia's first moly mine into life on time and within budget - no mean feat in today's environment and no thanks to the Qld Government.
Reality is something is worth what someone is prepared to pay for it.....YET 16c a share generates a market cap less than the cost of the WC plant....now that is ODD!
Then there's the issue of what is an appropriate valuation for the Mt Cannindah project!!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- QOL
- wolfram camp numbers revisited.
QOL
queensland ores limited
wolfram camp numbers revisited., page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 65 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm