i think that is correct. "bricky" or perhaps more to the point the company did not provide the information it stated would be forthcoming (irrespective of what the quality of that information might have been)it does not take einstein to recognize confetti and what, without prejudice,appeared to be equivocation by omission concerning the status with the Lilac process.
We know what is there, variously compared to multiples of the area of the Melbourne CBD, Manhattan and the volume of Sydney Harbour. The only thing that matters with Kachi now is can we get it out economically ?
what is required is a report in the next announcement on the status of processing options and the now overdue Lilac cost report . Lilac was used to excite interest in LKE and said to be "modular" and "scaleable". now we should keep it up to the company at every opportunity to state if it remains an option and if not then what is proposed,.
