Ann: Presentation of BIT225-009 HIV-1 Phase 2 Data, page-423

I think the exciting thing about the sudden jump in SP is all the new posters that are interested in engaging with Davisite!!!

For those that have not been following, Davisite has formed an opinion that BIT is no good based on not enough information, regardless of what other directs him to or provide as evidence. Using the line that there is "not enough information" for him to support the product, yet overlooking the fact that on the same basis, there is not enough evidence for him to continuously campaign against it yet continues to do so. Yet there are continous posts. Ive seen plenty of rampers on here, but Davisite is the one man scientific down ramper, (Picture a guy in a lederhosen with cymbals, a foot pedal drum and a harmonica)

In fact a quick look at the amount of posts on this topic from him and you can see a grit and determination that is rare, to bring this product and the scientific work of 20 years by specialist in the field down and discredit it.

I'll leave you all with this thought. The results have been given over for "peer review" to be accepted in to the upcoming conference in Miami. Was Davisite one of these peers? No.
Was it accepted, after the closing date? Yes. Draw your own conclusions from this, but mine is that Davisite is not a peer in this field and I shall treat him accordingly.

DYOR GLTAH