Originally posted by noodly
Please explain how you think keeping RT on for any future contractual work could be of any negative consequence to the company. A man who has 8 years experience with the company. What sort of harm could that do under a new chairman?
What are the Brown's offering as an alternative that you are so keen to vote for.
In the last few years we haven't had a Chairman although I recall PB saying (after Evans resigned) we'd have one in a few months.
I also recall there was much speculation as to where the new Chairman would come from and why it had been swept under the carpet...some suggesting someone from SMS or someone involved in the Ti02 off take ...as lawyers also at this stage had papers sitting on their desk ready to be signed. Now neither the off take or the Chairman was followed up on.
Completely left in the dark..There
This is typical PB BS....no explaining as to why nothing had occured in both of those cases till a few years later.
It does seem it's a secret boys club.
You cant tell me that there wouldn't be a suitable candidate for the Chair.
Makes one wonder why Evans left in the first case considering the potential of TNG.
Perhaps the Brown's know more... we certainly dont and we cant trust anything PB says otherwise the sp would be double than what it is with half as much dilution.
As I've said before the Mt Peake project is easy to sell because of it's potential ...I truely wish Biddle hadn't left...handling the top share holder as PB has makes me question his motives and what other stuff ups he's inflicked.
