qtly report, page-17

I have absolutely no idea why the Euro patent is so relevant and why it is so important to highlight it.

As for failing to excite investors, well, I have little doubt that the part that showed positive cashflow of only $500k would be the reason. I have little doubt that this would be because of forward expenses for upcoming contracts, but for me an explanation about that would carry much more weight than a separate announcement for a patent, and I am a little disappointed that the cashflow situation was not more clearly explained.

I do like the bit towards the end of the BRR interview with regard to educating the market about their services. That is definitely needed.