Hi Red In any case climate change hypothesis is reasonable as far as I can tell because the experimentally observed effects fall within the modelling envelope and make it a working theory
Unfortunately far too many unanswered questions, fudged answers and proven faulty modelling are a few of the items that make your hypothesis unbelievable
Much of it comes back to what proportion is man made ?
Measurements made now are done in a totally different way to those of 100 years ago, so how can you compare the results other than a guess. Plus the fact that most measurements which are reported are not actual measurements themselves but more guessing from computer models
Nature changes the climate ALL THE TIME naturally and a change that has occured over the last two or three thousand years cannot be reversed in such a short period as the proponents of GW insist is possible, it will probably be possible to control the climate at some time in the future but that time is still a long way away
In statistics it is impossible to use those figures too far into the future, if we could we would all be millionaires buying shares that are guaranteed to increase in value
No matter what field your interests are, the slightest deviation in your prediction will produce a far different result over a period of time
In the money market 24 hours successful prediction is a fantastic result.
