The classic use of ‘this person doesn’t agree with every single thing I say, they must be working for a competitor and are trying to run my company into the ground’ is one of the worst arguements you could use to counter a point put forward by a contrarian, or even a holder who is more cautious of their investment than others. The mods encourage a healthy debate between people with differing views because that’s what it is, healthy debate. To only look at the viewpoint of people ramping the company up 24/7 is a pretty bad investment strategy. The same could be said by only looking at the view of a contrarian. There are good, reasonable points on both sides of the argument.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CGB
- Ann: 6th Supplementary Prospectus
Ann: 6th Supplementary Prospectus, page-137
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 95 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CGB (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
MTL
MANTLE MINERALS LIMITED
Nick Poll, Executive Director
Nick Poll
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online