Hold my beer..., page-5

Pretty sure I explained that I had had an indepth look into the tech. So much so that I think it is more important than letting one guy botch it. I want to use it in the future but I also believe that it could potentially start the AI boom (but not with current management) and being a small ASX listed company it's more likely I'll have access to it and get a leveraged trade than a Chinese one or an Intel.

I know the stock was issued to cover his tax, but surely if he had done his job properly he would have lined up a buyer rather than let the trustee crater the market. And its a surprising thing, that specific number of shares they sold. If his liability stock was 7.5m units and they only sold 4.18m, was there some discussion between him and the trustee at a time he was in receipt of all this sensitive information to hold off the complete sale or even specify the amount - as it needs to be completely independent in order to claim protection from ASX market regulations. Not a blackout period? Please...

Being a non-holder currently makes me the smartest guy in this room since mid-2015, but I'll go now and just put in a search alert for  "Brainchip&249d" and revisit then.