Share
1,805 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 107
clock Created with Sketch.
15/01/19
11:52
Share
Originally posted by madamswer:
↑
"Not fantastic, didn't make it to $11m which was top end of guidance and pretty much confirmed they are expecting a loss 2nd half." It is not only a "not fantastic" update, but it is almost meaningless without any additional qualifying commentary. For example, what were the main drivers of that $10.5m figure? What was the sales growth in the half? The like-for-like sales performance? The Gross Margin? Admin expenses? Lower depreciation? For all we know, they might have achieved their revised guidance figure by simply deferring a whole lot of expenditure, for which they would then need to play catch-up in subsequent financial periods. And its not as if this kind of information would be considered commercially sensitive in the context of the current takeover bid, because in a little over a month's time, we will get to see all these relevant details, anyway, when the company will present a full set of its audited financial statements for the half-year. So why not, as an act of transparency, provide some clarity around that $10.5m figure? This company's management treats the owners of the business with utter contempt.
Expand
Originally posted by madamswer:
↑
"Not fantastic, didn't make it to $11m which was top end of guidance and pretty much confirmed they are expecting a loss 2nd half." It is not only a "not fantastic" update, but it is almost meaningless without any additional qualifying commentary. For example, what were the main drivers of that $10.5m figure? What was the sales growth in the half? The like-for-like sales performance? The Gross Margin? Admin expenses? Lower depreciation? For all we know, they might have achieved their revised guidance figure by simply deferring a whole lot of expenditure, for which they would then need to play catch-up in subsequent financial periods. And its not as if this kind of information would be considered commercially sensitive in the context of the current takeover bid, because in a little over a month's time, we will get to see all these relevant details, anyway, when the company will present a full set of its audited financial statements for the half-year. So why not, as an act of transparency, provide some clarity around that $10.5m figure? This company's management treats the owners of the business with utter contempt.
Expand
Looks as if the Takeover merchants are reading your Posts, Madamswer. The Australian 15/1/19 ... "Allensford says The Reject Shop's trading update is incomplete and demands it disclose to shareholders the makeup of its sales performance over the critical holiday period."