This is (from my perspective in the construction industry) the most important update from FBR in the time I’ve been a shareholder. While this does not cover every little detail, it gives a clearer picture of the why and how of WaaS.
It acknowledges that adoption of a new form of capital intensive equipment by construction companies was going to take time and provides a solution to that problem. The benefit of that solution is retaining control of our IP and, provided we can have Hadrian produced in sufficient numbers, generating our own adoption of robotically-built walls.
I am keen to learn how a critical mass of Hadrians will be paid for to enable us to reliably offer WaaS and hope this will be in an update before too long. Manufacturing sufficient numbers quickly enough to commit to construction contracts key. We need to be able to confidently bid for blocklaying/wall building tenders knowing we can then perform on time.
I am not convinced that ‘…offering bricklaying services is the lower risk’ option. Construction is a tough, unforgiving, adversarial business (I know, I spent most of the past 20 years enforcing construction contracts). There are serious costs if you don’t get it right and don’t finish on time.
However, I do agree it is potentially the higher value option. As a bricklaying contractor, FBR will have a massive competitive advantage over all those brick/block laying companies who will still be using slow and messy manual methods. We will be automated and also own the IP for our automation. As I’ve said in another post, if the WaaS model is executed well, FBR will seriously disrupt the blocklaying sector.
I note this update answers the question many posters have asked about the geographical manufacture of the machines; they will be manufactured near to where they are needed. It appears likely we (or a manufacturer on our behalf) will buy a truck, bring parts from our established global supply chain, and fit out the truck ready for use. Looking back at how Hadrian 1 was assembled last year, there appears to be a plan that is all coming together now.
Congratulations holders. We now own a construction company – one that owns its own specialist technology that gives us the potential (again, if executed well) for a very deep moat.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FBR
- Path to commercialization 2019
Path to commercialization 2019, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 97 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FBR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
3.7¢ |
Change
-0.001(2.63%) |
Mkt cap ! $177.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
3.7¢ | 3.8¢ | 3.5¢ | $477.7K | 13.12M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 3069009 | 3.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.8¢ | 1164268 | 6 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 3069009 | 0.037 |
8 | 349387 | 0.036 |
31 | 3949697 | 0.035 |
13 | 2390742 | 0.034 |
5 | 999545 | 0.033 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.038 | 1164268 | 6 |
0.039 | 387155 | 4 |
0.040 | 2504938 | 9 |
0.041 | 573302 | 5 |
0.042 | 780000 | 4 |
Last trade - 12.20pm 23/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FBR (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online