Gral
That is not a particular logical arguement there. The tender for the port is unrelated to the case and is done through a jointly MMX/Mitsubishi owned vehicle.
Banks given size of partner will always put up money. However Mitsubishi still hasnt finished paying for its 50% share of IO assets and that is where I assume MMX was going to get there contribution to infrastructure.
Even though you say the case is a dud still cant see Mitsubishi handing over any more money until case is resolved or else it will go into a trust pending an outcome.
Would you care to elaborate on why the case is a dud or is that just wishful thinking.
cant stay away, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CHM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $15.76M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.8¢ | $4.728K | 251.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 1691803 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.9¢ | 38684 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.03pm 03/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CHM (ASX) Chart |