Originally posted by Key Sole
That's difficult to get your head around
- On one hand AOW say their not involved in any Legal proceedings
- And at the end it suggests Defender have got them by the balls
I don't know if this all stems from ages ago or whatever, as I have never gone in depth here on my research, care to shed any further light.
Key Sole - the first six words of the section say it - "Other than set out below . . ." - and then they go on to casually mention the issues.
I'm not familiar with the history so I can't comment on how or when these obligations arose; I'm a relatively short-term holder. I'm sure there are others here who are far more clued up on the background than I am.
It also explains the recent board restructuring.
