Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Lying Liberals - fact, page-20

First 20 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
dan1

19,314 Posts.

30

06/03/19

12:22

Post #: 37670133
Share

Originally posted by Glug: ↑

If you need tax payers to subsidize your property investing to make it worthwhile, then there is something majorly wrong with the system.

Maybe to level the playing field, first home buyers should be allowed to negatively gear their first home, as it makes as much sense as any other negative gearing on established properties.

Hard to save sufficient when you are chasing a market where prices are increasing around $1,000 per week, and income growth is slow. Some can do it, others miss out to investors subsidized by tax payers.

So do you actually support the idea of us tax payers subsidizing investor losses on established homes through negative gearing?

Expand

the tax benefit is part of the ability for rental properties to be affordable as it effectively becomes a part of the investors yield.

Take that away and rents go up.
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

PTX

This rare type of lymphoma ruins the body – so do existing treatments. Prescient could have a solution

PSC

Prospect's Mumbezhi Project puts it at the middle of copper's megatrend. And FQM just bought in

WA8

Warriedar aims for Ricciardo MRE upgrade on 'thick, high-grade' gold and antimony

STX

Are Strike and Carnarvon Energy about to become best friends?

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

First 20 Last