some reading, page-4

"Maybe Vin you could post an article that states its effectiveness in 2008 in comparison to others"

Captain, this is what you should have attempted in conjunction with your post on the old news. You made no attempt to evaluate its relevance TODAY.

"I said it was old news, i stated that"

Captain, re-read your post. You did NOT state this

"But China has been going on since 2006...Mexico since Sept 2007"

Captain, that has nothing to do at all with the current relevance of the 4-year old rosita trials

"So it was what it was, which was an interesting comparison to others. I found it intersting, and i sure others might"

Sure, it was interesting - but as historical info, not as a useful input to judging the efficacy of Oraline iv TODAY

"So Vin you keep posting about articles in the US about how testing is being thought about or carried out. Unless it states Oraline then i personally see this as pointless"

Captain, thanks so much for allowing me to keep posting US articles! Also Captain, I don't see your 'pointless' argument. Is it 'pointless' to post articles on the RIO or BHP forums about China's consumption of resources that do not mention those companies? I don't think so! Same with the drug testing markets - wherever they are - and SBN.

"But each to their own hey Vin"

Exactly Captain. Couldn't agree more.