some reading, page-5

Vin i love how you use quotes and break a persons post down.

Maybe i should go over a dozen of your previous posts and illustrate to the forum your suggestions, price predictions and timelines.

Heres a report from April 2008 on Oral devices, same findings as 2003.

http://www.drug-monitoring.com/pt/re/tdm/abstract.00007691-200804000-00010.htm;jsessionid=LCkGRh2RChwJ2QHzwBH0JtL9YpbT12ntyBLKL1sXk62wsX1KQV24!634347399!181195628!8091!-1

You can buy the report for $35US

We may claim to have best detection, but what does it matter if its unreliable and sometimes inaccurate. This is possibly a reason as to why we didnt receive FDA.

I hope for better things from Oraline 8.

Vin no need to keep having an arrogant attitude either. I have seen how you always rip peoples posts apart, and make them seem amatuerish.

You did it with Maze the other day, you did it with me before when i posted footage of Oraline in NZ. Many times saying, nice post but that has been here before or interesting info HOWEVER, etc etc.

Just let posters be, like i said i thought it was interesting info. Yes it may be 4 years old but doesnt make it any less interesting. Plus in the current article APRIL 2008, findings are more or less the same, despite all the recalibrations and taking into effect the Earths position in relation to the moon.

Vintage stop being Mr Arrogant.