the point about Michael Malone is nonsense.
yes he's on numerous boards, but he was a non executive chair.
this is significantly different to being an executive director. He was always meant to be hands off.
the problem with meir and the founding directors is that they are in my opinion simply not suited to running a listed business. They don't acknowledge this and wont relinquish control to those that have the required skill sets and more importantly experience.
it's always a problem when the founding directors are closely linked and even friends. I'm only guessing but that may be also why Malone resigned, he had good ideas but the board were stubborn and didn't listen as they are all friends. So why bother being a director?
I think if SAS could, they would have 0 Australian directors and just run the ship themselves.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SAS
- Friday the THIRD ?
Friday the THIRD ?, page-58
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 57 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SAS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online