Doesn't sound like you exercise the concept of impartiality to me then? No wonder holders are frustrated if one chooses to exercise as much bias (like they do - which frustrates me too of course), when, a graph proves that point as confirmed by management, as opposed to 'opinion' like you say.
If you look at the chart below, you'll verify this yourself.
Q118 = $26.2M-$13.97M (Q417) = $12.2M (as shown via Q118 column
ANDverified in the table in the report))
Q218 = $41.5M-$26.2M (Q118) = $15.3M (as shown via Q218 column)
Q318 = $62.3M-$41.5M (Q218) = $21M (as shown via Q318 column)
Q418 = $94.1M-$62.3M (Q318) = $32M (as shown via Q418 column
ANDverified in the table in the report))
Q19 = $127.5M-$94.1M (Q418) = $33M (as shown via Q119 column
ANDverified in the table in the report)
Numbers above have been rounded
View attachment 1537195View attachment 1537207