MM
I disagree with the analogy. My point is simple. If any shareholder believes the company is not being run well enough then they should sell. Otherwise they must believe there is some greater reward in the offing. I pass no aspersion on any shareholder, simply make the point that I see no reason for disgruntled shareholders who see management as inept or the shareprice as overblown staying around. It's just an investment. Some work and some don't within the assigned timetable of the individual investor. If you still believe riches will flow with sufficient probability to satisfy the risk analysis we should all be conducting on all our investments then what is the underlying problem? My understanding of the way the company is hogtied at present has been stated. I also said that far from there being a complete news blackout, there are about 20 pages of releases from the company in the last 18 months. Most are dismissed as not providing sufficient information without the $ and customer contracts attached. As they are unable to comply with this natural curiosity those hoping for such details will remain disappointed.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
