credibility, page-27

In regards to negative posts on CVI may i make this observation. There are 2 groups here. Those with agendas whose identities i shall not point to and those with a genuine different point of view to the CVI fan club. Unfortunely, thanks to a small group with agendas, we have reached a point where no one can express concerns openly without being branded as having an agenda.

I think we have reached a point now where the constant bickering and inbalance of not havingly all genuine concerns openly expressed has become a far greater evil than that brought to us by agenda holders.

So could i suggest that as a trial for one week that we all try to attack the ball and not the man. Even if you believe someone has washed their socks in 100% concentrated high strength agenda try to approach them as if they were genuine. we have tried and tried the approach of calling them out and this approach has failed our forum miserably.

So even if you feel like you are being taken as an idiot by people with agendas could we try...for just 1 week....to respond to them as if their concerns were genuine.

i don't know if my idea is the ultimate answer but whatever approach we have been using is simply not working.

I have learnt so much from the people on this forum but lately i find myself skipping over more and more CVI posts...which is a real shame.