I agree with Shania.
I would sooner take less for all my holding than a small premium for part of the holding and then possibly be stuck with the remaining shares.
If Emerald/NOP then go off the wrong track, ie: like the previous management of GLI, then what happens.
At least where they are only trying to get board control with a holding of around 20% (and this applies equally to Bell or Emerald/NOP) there is always the hope of being able to kick them out if things go awry. But if they become entrenched with a 40% holding then as the old saying goes "Houston ... we may have a problem".
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GLI
- proportional off market takeover offer
GLI
goldlink incomeplus limited
proportional off market takeover offer, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)