Share
1,983 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1605
clock Created with Sketch.
04/06/19
14:01
Share
Originally posted by chuk:
↑
Thanks for posting. I just spoke to Michael who is overseas (sounded like he was on holidays) but was good enough to talk at length. I'm not going to try and quote him word for word in case I misunderstood anything but I did get the impression that he thought more work will need to be done to determine what rates of gas flow would be achievable on a sustained basis. He did seem to be suggesting that the heat energy and gas constitution was as reported by LCK and that there were no environmental issues at all but I got the impression that he thought flow rates might need to be improved - he mentioned that LCK might simply need to redesign the wells to improve gas flow rates. Perhaps that will be worked on with the partners that potentially buy in. They would no doubt have access to all the data and will have their own opinion on commercial viability risks. Importantly, Michael said that there was NO REASON at all why the department would not allow further work to be done by LCK or potential partners as a previous post seemed to be hinting at (and so I specifically asked that question). Overall I get the impression that are many boxes ticked, including heat energy and the quality of the gas constitution but more work needs to be done to determine the commercial viability. It seems there is plenty of interest so I'm holding and I might buy more depending on how this continues to trade. Again, thanks for your post Virtuozi.
Expand
Hi chuk, Great thanks for posting it's good to get another persons balanced view on this. Good to see you taking the time to do some research. No doubt the heat energy and quality of gas are fantastic. It's the flow rates and it could very well be as simple as tweaking the design of the wells. Just no acknowledgement of this, the trial has been a complete success according to LCK and no other comments provided other than that.