I do not follow the logic of your analogy as if I am buying a house I am not interested in the family members who own the home (ie Mulpha being a family member ) as I am mainly interested in is the intrinsic value of the house
Also from a valuation perspective I am not interested in the family members just interested in :
1.comparable values of other homes around the one I am valuing ,
2.or alternatively the construction cost of the home plus a bare land value
3. or on the final alternative the income generation of the home as a % of home price (cap rate )
for something like AOG , though which is a bit different from the family home as there is future development prospects I would rate it more like valuing a subdivision where an NPV valuation would be the method used so method 2 above but taking into account constructing more homes and a change in management with more hospice care for example to be factored in for income and expenses over future years .
I have an Applied science degree majoring in rural , residential and commercial valuation so maybe I have a different perspective from you .
Also be interesting from an ASIC legal perspective if Mulpha was involved in discussions not privy to all shareholders
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AOG
- Ann: Strategic Review Update
Ann: Strategic Review Update, page-37
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AOG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
JBY
JAMES BAY MINERALS LIMITED
Andrew Dornan, Executive Director
Andrew Dornan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online