CSS clean seas seafood limited

Ann: Change In Substantial Holding - IFM AG, page-11

  1. 27,955 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1354

    The answer the original question can probably addressed by the fact that CSS have had no problem paying their own costs to bring the legal action & haven't been material to the results of the company.


    Paying the costs of the defendants on losing would most likely be of a very similar level all be it being paid in one lump sum & as such would not be of an order that would threaten the viability of the company. Also worth noting that the company would not have started legal action or been allowed to do so if there was a perception that they couldn't pay defendants costs on losing.

    Plus the auditors would have to have put a note in the accounts regarding not being a going concern if they lost the case, clearly this is not the case.

    I personally am not banking on them winning the case & it was never part of my investment decision. I still believe the sp will be around double the current level in approx. 2 years time even if they don't win.

 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
13.5¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $28.28M
Open High Low Value Volume
13.5¢ 13.5¢ 13.5¢ $18.51K 137.1K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
6 4127350 13.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
14.0¢ 6763916 25
View Market Depth
Last trade - 15.40pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
CSS (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.