The current mandate in the Act appears quite clear on what infrastructure might be funded. I read the mandate to be quite broad - particulary (b) and (c). I also do not see anywhere in the Act that excludes private infrastructure such as the prawn farm itself (ponds and other infrastructure). At the end of the day it is a loan not a grant designed to increase economic activity in the North.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SFG
- political
political, page-20
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SFG (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.50M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | $2.02K | 673.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 1170760 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.4¢ | 2798965 | 10 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 1170760 | 0.003 |
31 | 27421056 | 0.002 |
16 | 55897521 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.004 | 2798965 | 10 |
0.005 | 2210164 | 9 |
0.006 | 3601681 | 7 |
0.007 | 1000000 | 3 |
0.008 | 300000 | 1 |
Last trade - 14.01pm 09/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SFG (ASX) Chart |