Ann: CNG Pipe-to-Pipe Transportion Project Economics, page-30

I Posted this in the other company thread, as you seem to attack Tukebay at every chance you get, so here is a taste of your own medicine. (and I share the sentiments earlier from Puttinfordough Post #:39671826 !!)

Dear John,

You and all can clearly see that there is a difference between your posts, that mostly attack Tukebay, and his, which are informative, researched, and factual posts on the companies he backs, with the reasons for his opinions.

Would be nice if you answered the question he asks ... ie please provide ANY post that you have written that gives any basis of researched factual information that will support your stance (whatever it is ).

I suspect that your response to me will either be to attack me, or just provide more nonsense about how you dont like his optimistic outlook on the two companies he has believes are going to help others be on winners.

It is actually difficult to understand what you dont like about his posts, because you dont refute his analysis with any counter argument, with your own reasons why you disagree with him.

Here's your chance to show everyone that you are capable of helping them, with some analytical argument based on the fundamentals (or technicals) of GEV . We are all ears and cant wait to learn something new from you