We could also point out that our product is 6.2% so our production is worth more than their "consistent production with the previous quarter" which is fancy speak for it was again 5.9%.
We could also point out that we spent $2million expanding our resource which is value creation spending as opposed to $4million on staff costs.
But the real truth is pick it apart anyway you want, they both doing pretty dam shit, fully ramped up operation still bleeding money take your pick of the three they all suck.
Focusing on us, if we going to have a big future, we need this deal to go binding with a start date.
Once we do that we won't have to have these conversations anymore because we will take our first huge step to being an integrated chemical producer not a concentrate seller.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- A40
- have we got a ship?
have we got a ship?, page-153
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 73 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add A40 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online