Ann: AMI Investor Presentation July 2019, page-26

You are the one making claims about details, but when questioned you have no details to add or make comments on. The details are that AMI met production ounces guidance and came in at +2% on their AISC guidance. All you do is deflect and make personal attacks when people question your cryptic, repetitive and vague outbursts that never have any value or informative content for any other people reading these threads.

So you didn't do your research and are trapped because you mis-timed your entry point and/or macro trade war factors and company specific news have driven sentiment in the market, most people would exit, re-examine their reasons for entry and enter again if they thought a better entry point was available, or alternatively exit and look at other options in other peers.

Its been proven many times that you don't understand mineral exploration, and you dont't understand underground mining so you clearly have no risk tolerance, you can't explain why you are here, and are too lazy to engage in constructive debate or ask questions, yet you wonder why your track record is so dismal. Even if AMI is as dreadful as you suppose, wouldn't you want to learn from your mistakes and from others here so you can time your entry better or develop your investment thesis so you can improve your stock picking abilities in the future?