How long until the thieves return to raid super, page-15

First 15 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bacci

12,694 Posts.

246

01/08/19

13:04

Post #: 39810253
Share

Originally posted by occam ↑

I gree with your sentiment, however, the Liberals didn’t start it. When they formed their policy on the balance cap , Labor had already announced that they would tax pensions in retirement for anybody earning more than $75000.
The real problem developed when Keating first started the Super system. Contributions were taxed on the way in. From then on politicians just couldn’t keep their hands off it , adding dozens of new rules restrictions, and taxes over the years. Finally, yesterday, Fitzgerald said in the Australian what I have been saying for years.
No contribution tax. No tax on fund earnings during accumulation phase. And then tax retirees at normal rates when they start drawing the pension. By this stage the balance is much larger and that system would be far less complicated , and there would not be the constant bleating about concessions. A number of countries do this . Sadly Govts have come to be reliant on the tax revenue so nothing likely to come of it. Once bad policy is introduced , and we have many in Australia, they are almost impossible to reverse.

Expand

Occam,
It would be possible to start the change by saying that all new accounts are taxed on withdrawls at full marginal rate with no tax on deposits from pretax or earnings.
I would also suggest that the fund can be used to cover periods of unemployment or medical treatment. The account would become a personalised social security fund.
bacci
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: Why are we red today? Because US CPI's at 3%

LIS

Li-S Energy the latest microcap to pivot to US defence market

LU7

Lithium Universe targets silver boom with breakthrough solar recycling tech

LDX

Lumos Diagnostics surges 140% on major US contract deal

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist