Hi mir911
long time holder, infrequent poster. Also, i know nothing about O&G other than what i read on HC.
Looking at the logic, would a complete absence of water so far mean that the likelihood of "fizz" in the secondary target is minimal?
If yes, does it also follow that there is less likely a reduced chance of "fizz"in the primary target (or is that too deep to tell yet?)
Thanks.
West Eregulla vs Waitsia imaging fizz, page-15
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
17.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.78%) |
Mkt cap ! $501.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.0¢ | 18.0¢ | 17.0¢ | $1.170M | 6.732M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 37 | 1634397 | 17.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 17.5¢ | 617607 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |